0.03/0.15 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s 0.12/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.12/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 0.12/0.36 % WCLimit : 300 0.12/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Jul 5 04:22:09 EDT 2024 0.12/0.36 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.38 This is a THF_ problem 0.21/0.38 Running vampire_ho --cores 8 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.21/0.40 % (4730)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/17Mi) 0.21/0.40 % (4730)First to succeed. 0.21/0.40 % (4730)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.21/0.40 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark 0.21/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark 0.21/0.40 thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType). 0.21/0.40 thf(type_def_6, type, b: $tType). 0.21/0.40 thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType). 0.21/0.40 thf(func_def_1, type, b: $tType). 0.21/0.40 thf(func_def_2, type, r: a > b > $o). 0.21/0.40 thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: a > b). 0.21/0.40 thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: (a > b) > a). 0.21/0.40 thf(func_def_9, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)). 0.21/0.40 thf(f25,plain,( 0.21/0.40 $false), 0.21/0.40 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f21])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f21,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ($true != $true)), 0.21/0.40 inference(superposition,[],[f15,f14])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f14,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ( ! [X0 : a] : (($true = (r @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)))) )), 0.21/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f11,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ! [X0 : a] : ($true = (r @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)))), 0.21/0.40 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f10])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f10,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ! [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : b] : ((r @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ($true = (r @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))))), 0.21/0.40 introduced(choice_axiom,[])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f6,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ! [X0 : a] : ? [X1 : b] : ((r @ X0 @ X1) = $true)), 0.21/0.40 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f5,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ! [X0 : a] : ? [X1 : b] : (r @ X0 @ X1)), 0.21/0.40 inference(rectify,[],[f1])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f1,axiom,( 0.21/0.40 ! [X0 : a] : ? [X1 : b] : (r @ X0 @ X1)), 0.21/0.40 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rtotal)). 0.21/0.40 thf(f15,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ( ! [X0 : a > b] : (((r @ (sK1 @ X0) @ (X0 @ (sK1 @ X0))) != $true)) )), 0.21/0.40 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f13,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ! [X0 : a > b] : ((r @ (sK1 @ X0) @ (X0 @ (sK1 @ X0))) != $true)), 0.21/0.40 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f9,f12])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f12,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ! [X0 : a > b] : (? [X1 : a] : ($true != (r @ X1 @ (X0 @ X1))) => ((r @ (sK1 @ X0) @ (X0 @ (sK1 @ X0))) != $true))), 0.21/0.40 introduced(choice_axiom,[])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f9,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ! [X0 : a > b] : ? [X1 : a] : ($true != (r @ X1 @ (X0 @ X1)))), 0.21/0.40 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f8,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ~? [X0 : a > b] : ! [X1 : a] : ($true = (r @ X1 @ (X0 @ X1)))), 0.21/0.40 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f7,plain,( 0.21/0.40 ~? [X0 : a > b] : ! [X1 : a] : (r @ X1 @ (X0 @ X1))), 0.21/0.40 inference(rectify,[],[f3])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f3,negated_conjecture,( 0.21/0.40 ~? [X2 : a > b] : ! [X0 : a] : (r @ X0 @ (X2 @ X0))), 0.21/0.40 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])). 0.21/0.40 thf(f2,conjecture,( 0.21/0.40 ? [X2 : a > b] : ! [X0 : a] : (r @ X0 @ (X2 @ X0))), 0.21/0.40 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',skolem)). 0.21/0.40 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark 0.21/0.40 % (4730)------------------------------ 0.21/0.40 % (4730)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.21/0.40 % (4730)Termination reason: Refutation 0.21/0.40 0.21/0.40 % (4730)Memory used [KB]: 5500 0.21/0.40 % (4730)Time elapsed: 0.003 s 0.21/0.40 % (4730)Instructions burned: 1 (million) 0.21/0.40 % (4730)------------------------------ 0.21/0.40 % (4730)------------------------------ 0.21/0.40 % (4725)Success in time 0.002 s 0.21/0.40 % Vampire---4.8 exiting 0.21/0.40 EOF